--- a/BUGS Thu Apr 01 19:39:24 2010 +0100
+++ b/BUGS Thu Apr 01 22:34:46 2010 +0100
@@ -1,34 +1,40 @@
+---
+
18:17 < Biolunar> when i change my resolution in dwm (to a smaller one) and then back to the native, the top bar is not repainted. that's since 5.7.2, in 5.6 it worked fine
18:19 < Biolunar> is it just happening to me or a (known) bug?
18:24 < Biolunar> and in addition, mplayers fullscreen is limited to the small resolution after i changed it back to the native
reproducible with xrandr -s but not with --output and --mode, strange
+---
> enternotify is handled even when the entered window is already focused
> (eg moving the mouse to the bar and back, scrolling on the border..)
- >
- > focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
- >
- > a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
- >
- > + c = wintoclient(ev->window);
- > if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
- > unfocus(selmon->sel);
- > selmon = m;
- > }
- > + else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
- > + return;
+>
+> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
+>
+> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
+>
+> + c = wintoclient(ev->window);
+> if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
+> unfocus(selmon->sel);
+> selmon = m;
+> }
+> + else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
+> + return;
-
+---
> another corner case:
a tiled client can be resized with mod+right click, but it only works
on the main monitor
+---
+
dmenu appears on the monitor where the pointer is and not on selmon
+---
yet another corner case:
open a terminal, focus another monitor, but without moving the mouse
@@ -36,7 +42,6 @@
if there is no client on the other monitor to get the focus, then the
terminal will be unfocused but it will accept input
-
---
Donald Allen reported this:
@@ -57,3 +62,15 @@
The quick fix is commenting out the code in lines 817/818 in hg tip
dwm. I cannot confirm this has no side effects (I think it does) and I
will address this issue shortly with a real fix.
+
+---
+
+SDL seems to not like non-reparenting WMs:
+
+> I would like to mention SDL problems, however SDL is not crucial to
+> me anymore; people that really care about it should speak up and
+> propose dwm / SDL patch or cooperation scheme in that matter.
+
+Patching SDL, bugging them?
+
+---