Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:18:57 +0200 prepared dwm-1.4 update 1.4
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:18:57 +0200] rev 438
prepared dwm-1.4 update
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:10:43 +0200 drawstatus even if no client exists
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:10:43 +0200] rev 437
drawstatus even if no client exists
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:54:16 +0200 sanders solution is convincing and elegant
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:54:16 +0200] rev 436
sanders solution is convincing and elegant
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:46:35 +0200 seems to preserve floating client z-layer order (even with reorder() calls)
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:46:35 +0200] rev 435
seems to preserve floating client z-layer order (even with reorder() calls)
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:54:10 +0200 Added tag 1.4 for changeset a6b8994af16491220db0199623bd57d061e06143
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:54:10 +0200] rev 434
Added tag 1.4 for changeset a6b8994af16491220db0199623bd57d061e06143
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:03:21 +0200 small fix
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:03:21 +0200] rev 433
small fix
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:23:34 +0200 made args mode symbols the default ones (the default ones look too ugly)
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:23:34 +0200] rev 432
made args mode symbols the default ones (the default ones look too ugly)
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:21:17 +0200 moved transient_for tag inheritance to settags
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:21:17 +0200] rev 431
moved transient_for tag inheritance to settags
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:13:31 +0200 no, reodering floating clients definately breaks the manage() policy which attaches all clients zoomed (otherwise higher-weight clients couldn't be attached zoomed, which sucks)
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:13:31 +0200] rev 430
no, reodering floating clients definately breaks the manage() policy which attaches all clients zoomed (otherwise higher-weight clients couldn't be attached zoomed, which sucks)
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0200 no, ordering floating clients at the end seems better
Anselm R. Garbe <arg@10kloc.org> [Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0200] rev 429
no, ordering floating clients at the end seems better
(0) -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip